How to Turn Weak Ties into Solid Job Leads

by Kevin Donlin on January 20, 2010

Post image for How to Turn Weak Ties into Solid Job Leads

In his 1973 article, “The Strength of Weak Ties,” sociologist Mark Granovetter, after interviewing dozens of people, determined that most jobs were landed through “weak” interpersonal ties — not friends telling friends, but acquaintances telling friends.

In other words, if you’re mostly asking friends to send you job leads, you won’t succeed as fast as asking acquaintances, who then ask their friends to help you.

Counter-intuitive, yes, but aiming your networking efforts at people you don’t know well is a faster way of gaining access to new social groups, where new job leads may be.

To quote Granovetter: “[T]hose to whom we are weakly tied are more likely to move in circles different from our own and will thus have access to information different from that which we receive.”

Weak ties include “an old college friend or a former work-mate or employer, with whom sporadic contact had been maintained,” according to Granovetter.

Here are three ways to turn weak ties with acquaintances into solid job leads …

1) Throw out “hooks”

An easy way to help people latch onto your ideas is to give them mental hooks.

About 6 weeks ago, I got a networking email from Cleo P., which began as follows:

From: Cleo [mailto:cleo@XYZ.com]

Subject: Networking Favor Request from Cleo – Hey, Do You Know . . .

Hi!

I have entered into a very targeted job search campaign which focuses on a select list of potential employers; and I was wondering if you could lend me a bit of help. Could you let me know if you know anyone who works at any of the companies on the following list so I can ask for a referral?

Now. I get dozens of emails like this every week. Most I can’t do anything with. But for some reason, I decided to check Cleo’s profile on Zoominfo.com. It turns out that she and I graduated from the same university.

This changed everything. I’m more likely to refer a fellow alum to people in my network than someone out of the blue, because we share an affinity.

So, the more “affinity hooks” you give to people you barely know, the more likely they are to latch onto your message and forward it to people they know.

Example “hooks” to use in networking messages:

  • schools you attended (alumni ties can be strong)
  • companies you’ve worked at (former co-workers are another form of alumni)
  • fraternities, sororities, other non-religious and non-political groups
  • charities or non-profits you’ve volunteered at

In Cleo’s case, I know the director of alumni career services at my alma mater very well, so I forwarded her email to him. I don’t think it hurt her chances.

2) Offer a reward

One way to get people to pay attention is to pay them cash.

That’s the angle M. Shane Smith, a marketing professional from Bloomington, Minn., has taken. He’s offering a $1,000 reward to anyone who gives him a warm introduction to a senior-level executive that leads to a job.

What is a warm introduction?

“Networking for many people means just getting a name, but a warm introduction is when someone does a little ‘gushing’ about you to others. For someone to gush, we need to meet,” says Smith, who hopes his $1,000 bounty produces more meetings.

In about 6 months, it has led to 6-8 warm introductions, 80% of which produced conversations with decision makers, according to Smith.

Smith also encourages referrals by including talking points in his networking emails, so recipients can speak about his skills specifically. How does he do it? By including quotes from executives in his emails.

Example: “Challenging and problem situations do not intimidate Shane and I often referred to him as: Mr. Motivation, Mr. Communication and Mr. Innovation.” – Chief Operating Officer.

3) Mail out letters

If a networking email sent to 40-100 people can produce 2-3 job leads, that same message — printed and mailed to only 10-20 people — can produce an equal or greater number of leads.

That’s because, in my experience, a snail mail letter merits more attention than an email. Perhaps because paper letters imply that you took the time, effort, and postage to get in touch.

So, I suggest you make a shortlist of 20 “weak networking connections” you want to get the word out to by U.S. Mail.

What can you write?

One Guerrilla Job Hunter, Jeff D., from Oxford, Michigan, wrote and mailed a four-paragraph letter and hit pay dirt this past November — his 20 networking letters produced three solid leads and a job, within four weeks.

His letter had three key parts:

1. Introduction: “I have recently left XYZ Co., where I was a JOB TITLE, and handled THESE JOB DUTIES.”

2. Achievements: “I played a pro-active role by _______________ that added __________________ to the bottom line and reduced costs by _________________________.”

3. Employment goals: “I seek a significant leadership role where my ___________________ skills and experience are required.”

The words aren’t as important as the fact that you’re clear about what you’ve done, what you want to do next, and what you’d like the reader to do.

Whom can you write to?

Well-connected school friends, former co-workers or managers, former clients or vendors, attorneys, real estate agents, bankers, old neighbors, and the like.

Jeff mailed his letter to 20 such people he knew professionally. It was a “weak tie” — a former vendor — who ultimately helped him find a new job.

Now, go out and make your own luck.

If your current resume isn’t working and you’d like to learn about unconventional, Guerrilla Resumes, visit http://workbloom.gjobnow.hop.clickbank.net/.

About Kevin:
Kevin Donlin co-authored "Guerrilla Resumes." Since 1996, he has provided job-search help to more than 20,000 people. Kevin has been interviewed by The New York Times, Fox News, ABC TV, CBS Radio and others.
  • Print
  • email
  • Add to favorites
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Related posts:

  1. Open Eyes, Open Mind, New Job
  2. Three Networking Tips from the Pros
  3. Two More Job Search Frustrations
  4. Two Networking Conversation Starters
  5. Job Search Technology: From High to Low — and No

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Paul Dahl January 21, 2010 at 5:04 pm

I have a history with Shane Smith. His LinkedIn profile :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mshanesmith
does not do him justice. While some of us dance to a different drummer Shane seems to be the drum corps as he is in touch with so many different worlds in business and community. His ideas seem throwback in many cases but in a world of Twitter, Facebook etc. it is these throwback ideas that are now more noticeable. The old tried an true can now be looked at as “new” but tried and true. Shane has them covered in any case. He can bring some company forward to new profitability and savings.

2 Tim Hennum January 22, 2010 at 12:12 am

I’ve known Shane for several years. He has a constant stream of fresh ideas and has the ability to see opportunities that fly under the radar for most. He is always willing to help and has done quite a lot for so many without ever seeking recognition, although he truly deserves it.

3 Greg Strosaker January 25, 2010 at 12:54 pm

Wow, is Shane paying you for your kind remarks? I have a lot of problems with that approach, and in fact every favorable mention I see of Shane would make me wonder if he had paid for that endorsement. Transparency matters more than ever today, and paying someone for a career-related testimonial (it’s not just a referral in that case) should raise just as much concern as a company paying a blogger for a favorable review (and such payment is now required disclosure per the FCC, like it or not). Should the prospective employer or business partner discover the payment, the relationship would be soured immediately.

The other points in the post are good and I agree that snail mail can be more effective than email.

4 Steve Siefert January 26, 2010 at 2:21 pm

I agree with Greg. Regardless of a person’s stellar performance, paying for a reference is unethical. When a company pays for an ad campaign to sell a product it’s understood there is a fee paid for the ad and that celebrities are well paid for their testimony. Such is not the case with professional referrals. An employer expects referrals to be unbiased as a professional courtesy. That’s why we typically don’t put much weight, if any, on recommendations from the candidate’s family and friends. When you do good work for other people, they tend to be quite happy to speak favorably about you at no cost to them. Paying for such a recommendation implies that it wouldn’t be made without payment.

5 Brenda L. January 26, 2010 at 5:00 pm

What would make you think that there was any compensation involved here? Because some people tried to be helpful you extrapolate there is dishonesty?

6 Greg Strosaker January 26, 2010 at 5:28 pm

Brenda, my comment was partially a joke but mostly to point out the fact that knowledge of past payments for “warm introductions” would certainly raise suspicion on the authenticity of any future endorsements.

7 Paul Dahl January 26, 2010 at 5:43 pm

Greg and Steve,
I think you are both missing the point here. What Shane is after is a “warm introduction” to a person that could lead to a job. For instance; “Steve, I’d like to introduce you to Greg whom I understand may be looking for someone like you. I would be glad to provide you with each other’s numbers in order to connect.”
Or how about this. “Greg, I know of a guy that has the skills your looking for. Can I introduce you?”
To me, these are warm intro’s. Shane gets a job and I can donate a cool thousand to my favorite charity. You want refernces as to the caliber of Shane’s work you have to get them from Shane … But, if I had worked with Shane and thought highly of him what the heck is the difference? I don’t get paid unless Shane gets a job. Which by the way, neither does he.

8 Tim Hennum January 26, 2010 at 5:49 pm

My comments had nothing to do with the offer Shane discussed. Rather, they are comments about the effort he has taken to pay it forward for hundreds of people. It was not requested nor was there compensation of any kind.

9 Greg Strosaker January 27, 2010 at 1:01 pm

Paul, then there is an issue with the language in the post, because it uses the word “gushing:”. “I know of a guy that has the skills you are looking for” is not “gushing”. Perhaps a better word choice in the post would make it a bit clearer. I’m OK with the idea of paying for referrals, which is more what you describe. What I take issue with is paying for “endorsements”, which is what I read the post to advocate.

10 Steve Siefert January 27, 2010 at 2:32 pm

Perhaps this is a good rule of thumb to apply: If you add the phrase “By the way he is going to pay me $X if you give him a job.” then there’s no problem with the introduction, gushing or not. Then you are disclosing your relationship with the candidate and your motivation to introduce him to the potential employer. If it doesn’t seem right to add the phrase, then ask “why not?”. Remember we’re not talking about the candidate merely treating the introducer to lunch or coffee.

11 Brenda L. January 27, 2010 at 4:27 pm

I don’t think anybody can really afford to pay someone else for a “recommendation” or that someone would make a recommendation just for money. Most of the time, you will actually have the firm for which someone is working pay its employees for making a referral (i.e. professional accounting and consulting firms). They know that if their own employees refer someone, they put their reputation on the line. Paying others for nice words could be more of an urban legend than anything else.

12 Kevin Donlin January 28, 2010 at 2:24 pm

Well, since I started this whole controversy — which is better than being roundly ignored, as usually happens to my columns :-) — so I’d like to offer a workaround.

Instead of offering cash reward only, you can offer folks 4 options:

1) $1000 cash for a warm introduction that leads to a job. This is nothing more than an employee referral program by another name, by the way. In this case, the employee is paying for the new hire, not the employer.

2) $1,000 gift card from Amazon, Visa, whatever. Some people who feel that a cash payment is too mercenary have no problems accepting gifts instead.

3) $1,000 donation to the charity of their choice, in their name or the name of a loved one. This option cannot possibly offend anyone who is not Joseph Stalin.

4) Your undying gratitude. Cash value: $0. Psychic value: priceless.

To sum up: there’s nothing unethical about rewarding good behavior that puts the right employee in the right company. The sticking point comes in how to offer that reward.

If anyone has better ideas, share them here. Thanks.

13 Harvey Andruss January 28, 2010 at 6:56 pm

I have no problem with “Jerry Maguire” helping Shane get a job with “show me the money” tactics. It’s ad-hoc agency business arrangement at its finest. Yes, like Steve mentioned it’d be best for all involved if the “sports team” that needs a “superstar” is made aware of the arrangement (e.g. “he’s so interested in meeting you he’s paying me for the opportunity”, which then can be followed up with some disclosures like “the guy’s serious, so he made me an offer I couldn’t refuse, but I wouldn’t do it if I didn’t believe you should meet him anyway” or what Paul said, “hey, I gave it to charity, but I really think you should meet him”). I just don’t get the immediate assumption that the go-between is a sleaze-ball for participating as if they would risk their reputation with the target person by hiding or lying about it. Think it through, dudes. “You complete me” with a specific reward from Kevin’s menu of choices is not a bad way to connect.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: